As you look for new people to help your
business grow, you may come across different terms that different recruiters
and head-hunters use to describe their services. For example, some agencies
offer direct staffing, while others offer temporary or contract staffing
The real question for you is this: "Which
is the best hiring process for my organization?" To help answer this
question, it is pertinent that we quickly do a comparative study: Contract
Staffing Vs Direct Staffing.
To compare, we will need to first define the
terms individually. Let's define and then find the benefits of each of them.
This will give you a clear picture, which will ultimately help you chart the
hiring plans for your company as per the requirements. Lets' get started.
Direct staffing is sometimes referred to as
direct placement. In the direct hiring process, the hiring company works to
find, qualify and hire full-time staff on behalf of the client. These are
usually full-time positions, but under few circumstances, direct employment may
also be used to fill part-time positions.
While the hiring company handles the hiring
task for direct hiring, new hires become employees of the client when the offer
is made and accepted. The salaries are directly disbursed by the client company
to the employees.
Contract Staffing India
Contract staffing entails hiring a workforce on
a contractual basis. The contract lengths can vary depending on the need of the
clients. The contract staffing hiring process is very similar to the direct
hiring process in terms of how hiring is done. However, the selected candidate
gets the salary from the hiring agency rather than the client. Contract
staffing increases flexibility for the client. The client has the opportunity
to turn the contractor into a full-time employee, based on its need analysis.
Contract Staffing Vs Direct Staffing:
Let?s see the difference between contract-based employment and direct
It is important to understand that there is a
big difference between contract employees and directly hired employees. The
differences are as follows:
- Contract staffing, as the name suggests,
entails contract/temporary positions. Whereas, direct hiring is commonly a
- Because direct hires have a long-term
perspective, the hiring process is slower than the contract positions.
- The contract workers are not entitled to the
company benefits however, that does not mean they do not get the facilities like
Provident Fund & ESIC and other statutory benefits, its certain other
privileges like reimbursement on travel, long distance travel allowance etc.
which they might not be entitled for. Whereas, direct jobs are covered by the
benefits provided by the company.
Get the Best Staffing Solutions
We hope the above post, Contract Staffing Vs
Direct Staffing, has been helpful to you. Depending on your particular
situation, one of the staffing processes described here may be more suitable
for your needs than the other.
Need help in deciding whether to have a
contract staffing or direct staffing solution?
staffing specialists are always enthusiastic about helping the clients. Our
team of recruitment experts will analyze your needs and goals and make
suggestions tailored to your timeline and budget.
When you deal with Weavings, you know
that you are dealing with one of the best temporary staffing services India
could brag of! At the same time, Weavings is also one of the top-notch contract
staffing India can boast of! In fact, we are one of the most reputed HR
consulting companies that have carved a niche for themselves in providing
turnkey staffing solutions to clients.
Contact us now to schedule a free consultation.